Some stories—especially comedies—include a character who seems to have the job of making sure everything comes out right in the end. Let’s call them the Master Contrivers.
“I manage things a little”
The Contriver doesn’t force things into place. Rather, she pulls strings. A good deal of finagling, a certain amount of chicanery, and a talent for talking people into things are generally involved.
Dolly Levi of Hello, Dolly! is a familiar example. The show starts with an array of dissatisfied characters. Horace Vandergelder wants a wife. His niece Ermengarde wants to marry impecunious artist Ambrose Kemper. Horace’s clerks, Cornelius Hackl and Barnaby Tucker, want to escape their humble jobs for a day—and maybe fall in love. Their opposite numbers, Irene Molloy and her assistant Minnie Fay, are also eager for a spree and a romance. Dolly herself, a self-proclaimed meddlesome widow, is ready to settle down with a new husband.
With magnificent confidence, the ebullient Dolly takes on the task of resolving all these plotlines. She suggests, cajoles, misdirects, confuses, and manipulates until everything works out. We enjoy how all this frivolity and chaos converges magically to a neatly satisfying outcome, like a sleight-of-hand trick.
Hardly anyone else knows quite what they’re doing at any given time, but Dolly has everything under control. Even where she lacks a specific plan, she is an expert improviser. The other characters can safely rely on her to solve all problems.
The Master Contriver frequently pops up in P.G. Wodehouse’s comedies. The best-known example is the imperturbable gentleman’s gentleman Jeeves. No matter what sort of absurd scrape Bertie Wooster gets into, Jeeves can always find a way to get him out again. Half the fun is watching to see exactly how Jeeves will pull it off this time. (The other half is simply listening to Bertie narrate, which is a joy in itself.)
But Jeeves is far from the only Wodehouse example. At Blandings Castle, the fiftyish but dapper Galahad Threepwood lives up to his name by spreading sweetness and light in the form of good fun, lovers united, and overbearing aunts thwarted. The lively and irreverent Uncle Fred (Earl of Ickenham) plays a similar role in other tales, to the alarm and embarrassment of his nephew Pongo Twistleton; sometimes these adventures also take place at Blandings. (It’s too bad Wodehouse never brought Gally and Uncle Fred onstage at the same time—ideally with Bertie and Jeeves as well. The mind boggles at what wackiness might develop with three Master Contrivers simultaneously at work.)
All the above examples are middle-aged men or women. The sublime Rupert Psmith (“The p . . . is silent, as in phthisis, psychic, and ptarmigan”) represents a rare younger version of the merry manipulator. He actually becomes a protagonist, with his own romantic plotline, in Leave It To Psmith (1923)—at Blandings, naturally.
Science fiction abounds in exceedingly clever manipulators, but most of them fit the mold of the trickster-hero rather than the master contriver: they are frequently the protagonists, and their stories tend to be more serious. Miles Naismith Vorkosigan, Salvor Hardin, Gandalf the Grey (in The Hobbit), and Seth Dickinson’s Baru Cormorant are good examples.
But the comic contriver is not unknown. In Heinlein’s rollicking family yarn The Rolling Stones (1952), Hazel Stone, the superficially crusty grandmother figure, is often the one who “arranges things”—including appearing in court to get her grandsons off the hook in a tax case on Mars.
Masters and Matchmakers
The Master Contriver is perhaps most at home in romantic comedies. Georgette Heyer’s Regency romances feature a few such characters. Sometimes they’re the romantic interests of female protagonists, since genre romances are fond of dominant “alpha male” heroes. But one of the most enjoyable is the titular female lead in The Grand Sophy (1950). Like Psmith and Dolly, young Sophy cheerfully arranges a romance for herself at the same time as she resolves other characters’ star-crossed affairs.
In the musical Oklahoma! we have Aunt Eller, the spiritual counterpart of Uncle Fred. She’s perfectly capable of pulling a gun to halt a burgeoning brawl (see this clip at about 3:05), but her main job is to guide her niece Laurey to a happy resolution of her uneven romance with the expansive cowboy Curly.
As the third-party plot manager for a romantic comedy, the Master Contriver often functions as a matchmaker. Hello Dolly! was based on a Thornton Wilder play literally titled The Matchmaker. Even Miles Vorkosigan, in a gently comic scene in The Warrior’s Apprentice, briefly burlesques the role of a traditional Barrayaran matchmaker for his own lifelong crush Elena and the man she’s fallen in love with. (Miles’ own romance does not develop until several novels later.)
The Character of the Contriver
A third-party Master Contriver naturally falls into the niche of the benevolent uncle or aunt—a kindly older person who isn’t typically a player himself, but an enabler of other characters’ fulfillment (though we’ve seen some counter-examples above). In fact, this position is not unlike the role of the fairy godmother in Cinderella.
The role resembles that of a mentor, although, unlike the Missing Mentor of whom we’ve spoken before, this mentor-manager is generally very much present, in the thick of the action. Yet the Contriver is a little detached, not as directly involved as the principals; she can take things a little lightly. She can thus be more jolly, less earnest.
Since the Contriver is generally working toward other characters’ happy endings, not her own, she lends the story a sense of generosity. This is why we don’t mind a character who might otherwise seem manipulative. We typically think of “maniuplative” as a troublesome trait, not an appealing one. But an avuncular figure who can be trusted to manipulate people only for their own good becomes an asset rather than a problem.
The Atmosphere of the Story
It helps make a comedy pleasant when there are people disinterestedly spreading sweetness and light. This is why the Contrivers play so well in comedies of manners and romantic comedies, where the plots have to be intricate, but light-hearted.
Since we’re typically dealing with interpersonal relations, not slam-bang action plots, Master Contrivers achieve much of their effectiveness by influencing other people. For this reason, they generally possess considerable personal magnetism or “charisma.” This, again, adds to the general air of genial good-fellowship in a comedy.
But the greatest effect on the atmosphere of the story, I think, is that it’s reassuring to have someone around who can be trusted to untangle all plotlines to a happy ending: “till by turning, turning we come ’round right.” We come into a comedy expecting things to turn out well. The more the happy ending is in question, the more the story begins to look like a thriller rather than a comedy. If Dolly or Gally is on the scene, we can rest easy on that score, and enjoy the ride.
6 thoughts on “The Master Contriver”
See also “Hitch.”
Yes — Hitch is a master arranger for everyone else. The trick in that movie is that he fails to manage as well for himself — which lends a certain charm to his uncharacteristic awkwardness, but raises questions about plausibility. The fact that his contrivances on his own behalf go wrong in such spectacularly unpredictable ways (the girlfriend’s unexpected family history, an unknown allergy…) makes it seem the screenwriters are just forcing him to fail for plot reasons.
I hadn’t thought of those characters in that way before – but I love your analysis. I think I need to add a master contriver into my next story – thank you!
They do add a certain éclat to a story, I think. 🙂
Pingback: Third-Party Love Songs | Rick Ellrod's Locus
Pingback: Unevenly Matched | Rick Ellrod's Locus